ABSTRACT
Background: Vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 represent a fundamental tool in controlling the pandemic. To date, data on the safety of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with rare rheumatic diseases, such as systemic vasculitis, are limited. Objectives: In this study we aimed at evaluating the safety of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in a multicentric cohort of patients with systemic vasculitis. Methods: Patients with systemic vasculitis from two Rheumatology centres who had received anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine were retrospectively examined. The primary outcome was to evaluate, in this multi-centric cohort, the occurence of a disease fare after the administration of the vaccine, defned as development of clinical manifestations related to vasculitis with a concomitant increase in serum infammatory markers. As a secondary outcome we aimed at evaluating, in a monocentric cohort of patients with vasculitis, the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) following vaccine administration compared to healthy controls (HC). Results: We examined 111 patients with systemic vasculitis (n=69 female, n=42 male), with a mean age of 64.3 (± 13) years. Sixty had ANCA-associated vas-culitis (AAV), fourty-two had Giant-Cell Arterities (GCA), five had Periarteritis Nodosa, four had Takayasu's arteritis. One-hundred and five patients received a mRNA vaccine and six a viral vector one. A disease fare occurred in only 2 patients (1.8%) after the frst dose of a mRNA vaccine: both had AAV (microscopic poliangioitis) and developed a pulmunary disease fare (respiratory failure requiring hospitalization and treatment with high-dose glucocorticoids). Of note, one of these patients had multiple previous comorbidities, including a severe COPD. Multivaried analysis, adjusted for age and sex, performed in a single monocentric cohort of patients with systemic vasculitis [n=60 (39 AAV, 21 GCA), 37 female, 23 male, mean age 71 (± 12.5) years] demonstrated a statistically sig-nifcant higher frequency of AEs in vasculitis patients compared to HC (p=0.015) after the frst dose of vaccination. No signifcant differences in the frequency of AEs in vasculitis patients compared to HC after the second dose were detected. All the AEs were mild in both groups (malaise was the most frequently reported);no serious AEs were reported. Conclusion: Our data show a very low incidence of disease fares after the administration of anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with systemic vasculitis. Patients with systemic vasculitis seem more prone to develop mild AEs after the frst dose of the vaccine. Taken together, this data suggest a good risk profile for anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with systemic vasculitis.
ABSTRACT
Background: Antimalarials have been associated with QT prolongation in COVID19 patients but are generally safe in patients with rheumatologic disease. Objectives: Aim of the study was to compare the prevalence of QTc prolongation between COVID19 and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) patients treated with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ). Methods: We included consecutive patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection confirmed by nasopharyngeal swab and patients taking HCQ for SLE. A prolonged QTc was defined as an increase in QTc intervals ≥60 ms (compared with baseline) or as a QTc of ≥500 ms. Results: We enrolled 58 COVID19 patients (median age 70.5 years, IQR 25). HCQ, without or with azithromycin, was given to 26 (44.8%) and 15 patients (25.9%), respectively;17 (29.3%) had not received either drug. The median baseline QTc was 432 (IQR 36) and prolonged QTc was observed in 15 (26%) patients (12 QTc≥500 ms and 3 patients ΔQTc≥60 ms). We didn't find significant differences in QTc prolongation among the three treatment groups. Baseline QTc (OR 111.5) and D-dimer (OR 78.3) were independently associated to QTc prolongation. Compared to the 50 SLE patients (median age of 38.5 years, IQR 22), chronically treated with HCQ, patients with COVID19 showed significantly longer QTc (p < 0.001) (Table 1). Conclusion: This is the first study demonstrating that, differently from COVID19 patients, patients with SLE are not susceptible to HCQ-induced long QT syndrome and arrhythmia. The combined arrhythmogenic effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection and HCQ could account for the excess of QTc prolongation and fatal arrhythmias described in patients with COVID19.
ABSTRACT
Background: Since the beginning of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak, antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), a known thrombotic risk factor, have been studied in COVID-19 patients, in whom thromboembolic events have been associated with poor prognosis. To date, the pathogenetic role of aPL and the trend over time is still unknown. Objectives: Aim of the study was to investigate whether aPL positivity was correlated with thrombosis in COVID-19 patients and whether it was a transient or persistent. Methods: We included all consecutive COVID-19 patients hospitalized at Policlinico Umberto I, Sapienza University of Rome from April 1, 2020 to June 7, 2020. In these patients, serum levels of anti-cardiolipin (aCL) IgM, IgG, IgA, anti-β2glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) IgM, IgG were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and Lupus Anticoagulant (LA) was detected with coagulatory tests in patients not in treatment with anticoagulant drugs. Results: Five out of 73 (6.8%) patients resulted positive for aCL IgM, 3 of them also tested positive for aβ2GPI IgM. aCL IgA were tested positive in 14 out of 46 patients (30.4%). Overall 18 patients resulted positive for at least one test. Seven (9.6%) patients developed thrombotic events during hospitalization, 3 of them resulting positive for aPL (Table 1. below). We observed that patients showing double positivity for aCL IgM and aβ2GPI IgM had a likelihood positive ratio of 6.3 for thrombotic events (p=0.012) and a likelihood positive ratio of 4.9 for increased D-dimer levels (p=0.027). aCL IgA, the most prevalent aPL in this cohort, was not associated with thrombosis. Of the 18 aPL positive patients, 5 died, 3 were lost to follow-up, and 10 were tested on a second occasion at least 12 weeks, two patients confirmed positivity without clinical signs suggestive of APS. Conclusion: These results suggest that double positivity for aCL and aβ2GPI IgM increases the risk of thrombosis in COVID-19 patients, unlike aCL IgA. APL positivity may be persistent and it is advisable to monitor it over time.
ABSTRACT
Vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia with cerebral venous thrombosis is a syndrome recently described in young adults within two weeks from the first dose of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine. Here we report two cases of malignant middle cerebral artery (MCA) infarct and thrombocytopenia 9-10 days following ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccination. The two cases arrived in our facility around the same time but from different geographical areas, potentially excluding epidemiological links; meanwhile, no abnormality was found in the respective vaccine batches. Patient 1 was a 57-year-old woman who underwent decompressive craniectomy despite two prior, successful mechanical thrombectomies. Patient 2 was a 55-year-old woman who developed a fatal bilateral malignant MCA infarct. Both patients manifested pulmonary and portal vein thrombosis and high level of antibodies to platelet factor 4-polyanion complexes. None of the patients had ever received heparin in the past before stroke onset. Our observations of rare arterial thrombosis may contribute to assessment of possible adverse effects associated with COVID-19 vaccination.